Peran Hukum Adat dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah di Masyarakat Desa Sesela

Authors

  • Maulana Ibrahim Program studi Ilmu Hukum Universitas Mataram, Indonesia
  • Anggara Kusuma Program studi Ilmu Hukum Universitas Mataram, Indonesia
  • Ma’rifatullah Program studi Ilmu Hukum Universitas Mataram, Indonesia

Keywords:

Customary Law, Land Disputes, Conflict Resolution, Sesela Village, Local Wisdom

Abstract

Sesela Village is one of the areas that still upholds local wisdom values and customary legal institutions in the community’s social life. Land disputes in this region are generally resolved through customary mechanisms before resorting to the formal state legal system. This study employs a qualitative approach using a case study method, through in-depth interviews, observation, and documentation involving customary leaders, village officials, and community members involved in the dispute resolution process. The findings indicate that customary law plays a significant role as a means of resolving agrarian conflicts in a preventive and solution-oriented manner. The presence of customary figures, such as traditional elders and religious leaders, functions as trusted mediators for the disputing parties. The customary land dispute resolution mechanism emphasizes not only aspects of positive law but also upholds values of deliberation, peace, and social balance. However, there are challenges in harmonizing customary law with national law, particularly regarding the formal legal recognition of customary settlements. This study recommends strengthening the synergy between village governments, customary institutions, and state legal bodies to create a fair and sustainable land dispute resolution system.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afiff, S., & Rachman, N. F. (2019). Reformasi Agraria: Perjalanan dan Tantangan di Indonesia. Jakarta: Sajogyo Institute.

Arizona, Y. (2013). Pluralisme Hukum dan Kebijakan Agraria. Jakarta: Epistema Institute.

Bedner, A., & Van Rooij, B. (2011). Access to Justice and Legal Empowerment: Making the Poor Central in Legal Development Cooperation. Leiden Journal of International Law, 24(4), 847–863.

Benda-Beckmann, F. von, & Benda-Beckmann, K. von. (2006). The Dynamics of Change and Continuity in Plural Legal Orders. Journal of Legal Pluralism, 38(53-54), 1–44.

Fauzi, A. (2018). Legitimasi Sosial Hukum Adat dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah. Jurnal Hukum IUS, 6(3), 389–400.

Fauzi, N. (2016). Konflik Agraria dan Hukum Adat. Yogyakarta: Insist Press.

Hooker, M. B. (2008). Indonesian Syariah: Defining a National School of Islamic Law. Singapore: ISEAS Publishing.

Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.

Safitri, M. (2010). Recognition of Adat Community Rights in Indonesia’s Agrarian Law: A Long Struggle for Justice. Jurnal Hukum IUS, 1(1), 45–60.

Satria, A. (2015). Harmonisasi Hukum Adat dan Hukum Negara dalam Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 45(4), 567–582.

Sirait, M. (2009). Indigenous Peoples and Access to Justice in Indonesia. The Asia Foundation Report.

Soetandyo, W. (2014). Hukum dan Masyarakat. Jakarta: ELSAM.

Sumardjono, M. S. W. (2008). Tanah dalam Perspektif Hak Ekonomi Sosial dan Budaya. Jakarta: Kompas.

Sutaryono, A. (2017). Resolusi Konflik Tanah Berbasis Adat di Indonesia. Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia, 38(2), 77–90.

Widjaja, A. W. (2012). Restorative Justice dalam Sistem Hukum Adat Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 7(1), 14–28.

Zen, M. T. (2020). Konstruksi Hukum Adat dalam Kerangka Reforma Agraria. Jurnal Rechts Vinding, 9(1), 33–47.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-24

How to Cite

Ibrahim, M., Kusuma, A., & Ma’rifatullah, M. (2025). Peran Hukum Adat dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah di Masyarakat Desa Sesela. Legal Note, 1(1), 7–12. Retrieved from https://ejournal.kalibra.or.id/index.php/legalnote/article/view/21