Analisis Sintaksis dan Semantis dalam Ragam Bahasa Indonesia Formal dan Nonformal

Authors

  • Agus Kusuma Wardana Program Studi Bahasa Indonesia, Universitas Pendidikan Mataram, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70716/jols.v1i2.32

Keywords:

sociolinguistics, communicative competence, language variation, pragmatic competence, indonesian language, formal and nonformal registers

Abstract

Language use is deeply rooted in its social context, where syntactic and semantic choices reflect both situational formality and communicative intent. This article explores how syntactic and semantic patterns differ between formal and nonformal varieties of Indonesian language, focusing on implications for language learning and teaching. The study aims to investigate how sociolinguistic approaches—particularly those emphasizing communicative competence—can be integrated into secondary school language instruction to enhance students’ pragmatic and sociocultural awareness. Using a qualitative descriptive method and literature review approach, data were collected from scholarly sources such as journals, books, and conference proceedings available through platforms like Google Scholar. Thematic content analysis was used to identify patterns and key findings. The results indicate that practical classroom strategies—such as authentic discourse analysis, role-playing, and language variation discussions—can significantly improve students’ understanding of language register, politeness strategies, and contextual appropriateness. This, in turn, enhances their pragmatic competence and social adaptability. The paper highlights the value of sociolinguistic frameworks as a bridge between linguistic knowledge and real-world communication skills, calling for curriculum reforms and teacher training to better address these dimensions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bell, A. (1984). Language style as audience design. Language in Society, 13(2), 145–204. https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450001037X

Canagarajah, S. (2006). Changing communicative needs, revised assessment objectives: Testing English as an International Language. Language Assessment Quarterly, 3(3), 229–242.

Celce-Murcia, M., Dörnyei, Z., & Thurrell, S. (1995). Communicative competence: A pedagogically motivated model with content specifications. Applied Linguistics, 16(1), 5–35.

Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. Anchor Books.

Holmes, J. (2013). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics (4th ed.). Routledge.

Hymes, D. (1972). On Communicative Competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics (pp. 269–293). Penguin.

Kasper, G., & Rose, K. R. (2002). Pragmatic development in a second language. Blackwell Publishing.

Koike, D. A. (2009). Pragmatic competence and adult L2 learners. Pragmatics and Language Learning, 12, 26–48.

Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. University of Pennsylvania Press.

Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Wardhaugh, R., & Fuller, J. M. (2015). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics (7th ed.). Wiley Blackwell.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-28

How to Cite

Wardana, A. K. (2025). Analisis Sintaksis dan Semantis dalam Ragam Bahasa Indonesia Formal dan Nonformal. Journal of Language Studies, 1(2), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.70716/jols.v1i2.32