Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Inovatif untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa PGSD
Keywords:
sociolinguistics, communicative competence, language teaching, pragmatic awareness, language variation, PGSD studentsAbstract
Language is not merely a system of rules but a social tool deeply embedded in context. In language education, especially for prospective primary school teachers (PGSD students), it is crucial to foster not only grammatical proficiency but also communicative competence, which includes pragmatic and sociocultural awareness. This article aims to explore the integration of sociolinguistic approaches in language learning as an innovative pedagogical model to enhance students' critical thinking and communicative competence. Using a qualitative descriptive method through literature review, this study gathers and analyzes academic documents from reputable databases such as Google Scholar. Thematic content analysis was employed to identify patterns and key concepts. The findings show that implementing sociolinguistic-based learning—such as authentic discourse analysis, role-playing, and discussions on language variation—effectively improves students' understanding of language variation, register, politeness, and contextually appropriate language use. These strategies also foster pragmatic and sociocultural competence. The study concludes that sociolinguistics plays a pivotal role in bridging linguistic knowledge and practical communication skills, thus preparing students for real-world language use in diverse social contexts.
References
Alptekin, C. (2002). Towards intercultural communicative competence in ELT. ELT Journal, 56(1), 57–64.
Bell, A. (1984). Language style as audience design. Language in Society, 13(2), 145–204. https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450001037X
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–47.
Goffman, E. (1955). On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry, 18(3), 213-231.
Hinkel, E. (2014). Culture and pragmatics in language teaching and learning. Teaching English as a second or foreign language, 4, 394-408.
Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. Sociolinguistics, 269293, 269-293.
Kasper, G., & Schmidt, R. (1996). Developmental issues in interlanguage pragmatics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(2), 149-169.
Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Salzmann, Z. (2003). An introduction to sociolinguistics. Language, 79(4), 824-825.
Savignon, S. J. (2002). Interpreting communicative language teaching: Contexts and concerns in teacher education. Yale University Press.
Soler, E. A., & Martínez-Flor, A. (2008). Pragmatics in foreign language contexts. Investigating pragmatics in foreign language learning, teaching and testing, 30(1).
Taguchi, N. (2007). Development of speed and accuracy in pragmatic comprehension in English as a foreign language. TESOL Quarterly, 41(2), 313–338.
Thomas, J. (1995). Meaning in interaction: An introduction to pragmatics. Routledge.
Wardhaugh, R., & Fuller, J. M. (2015). An introduction to sociolinguistics (7th ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Elementary Education Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.