Tantangan Globalisasi dan Strategi Ketahanan Ekonomi Domestik di Era Perdagangan Bebas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70716/econote.v1i2.83Keywords:
globalization, economic resilience, free trade, domestic strategy, competitivenessAbstract
This article examines the challenges posed by globalization and the strategies required to strengthen domestic economic resilience in the era of free trade. The research aims to analyze how globalization impacts national economies, particularly in developing countries, and to propose strategies that can enhance their competitiveness while maintaining economic sovereignty. Using a qualitative research design, this study relies on secondary data from journals, policy reports, and economic statistics. The results indicate that globalization provides opportunities in terms of market access, investment, and technology transfer, but simultaneously creates threats such as market dependency, trade deficits, and deindustrialization. The discussion emphasizes the need for adaptive policies, investment in human capital, strengthening local industries, and enhancing regional economic cooperation. This study concludes that a balance between global integration and domestic resilience is crucial for sustainable economic development. Recommendations include fostering innovation, building institutional capacity, and encouraging inclusive policies that reduce inequality. These findings contribute to the ongoing debate on globalization and provide insights for policymakers aiming to safeguard national economic interests.
Downloads
References
Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. Crown Business.
Akyüz, Y. (2019). Playing with Fire: Deepened Financial Integration and Changing Vulnerabilities of the Global South. Oxford University Press.
Briguglio, L. P. (2016). Exposure to external shocks and economic resilience of countries: Evidence from global indicators. Journal of Economic Studies, 43(6), 1057–1078.
Chang, H. J. (2003). Kicking away the ladder: Infant industry promotion in historical perspective. Oxford Development Studies, 31(1), 21–32.
Evenett, S. J. (2020). COVID-19 and trade policy: Why turning inward won’t work. URL: https://voxeu.org/content/covid-19-and-trade-policywhy-turning-inward-won-t-work
Faudzi, M. H. M. (2018). Globalization and its discontents revisited: Anti-globalization in the era of Trump. International Journal of Economics, Management and Accounting, 26(1), 247–251.
Feliciano, Z. M., & Doytch, N. (2020). Trade liberalization and firm performance: The case of Thailand. Contemporary Economic Policy, 38(4), 607–621.
Kapstein, E. B., & Milanovic, B. (2001). Responding to globalization: Social policy in emerging market economies. Global Social Policy, 1(2), 191–212.
Kay, J. (2014). The world's rich stay rich while the poor struggle to prosper. The Financial Times, 7–7.
Kuźnar, A. (2024). Shaping the economic resilience in East Asia through international trade. In Regional Cooperation and Resilience in East Asia (pp. 52–73). Routledge.
Nunes, A. B. (2020). Book review: Global inequality. A new approach for the age of globalization. European Journal of Management Studies, 25(1), 45–46.
Pretorius, O., Drewes, E., Van Aswegen, M., & Malan, G. (2021). A policy approach towards achieving regional economic resilience in developing countries: Evidence from the SADC. Sustainability, 13(5), 2674.
Rodrik, D. (2016). Premature deindustrialization. Journal of Economic Growth, 21(1), 1–33.
Rodrik, D. (2017). Straight Talk on Trade: Ideas for a Sane World Economy.
World Bank. (2020). World Development Report 2020: Trading for Development in the Age of Global Value Chains. World Bank Publications.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ahmad Ramadhan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





